Daniel Madariaga on Hoe Traditional Building Materials Generate 11% of CO₂ Emissions — Implementing Alternatives Is Essential

Daniel Madariaga on Hoe Traditional Building Materials Generate 11% of CO₂ Emissions — Implementing Alternatives Is Essential.

Daniel Madariaga. The construction industry contributes approximately 11% of global CO₂ emissions, according to recent data from the Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction in its 2023 report. This underscores the urgency of addressing the environmental impact of traditionally used materials such as steel and cement. The latter alone accounts for 8% of global carbon dioxide emissions due to manufacturing processes that require high temperatures and intensive fossil fuel use, resulting in considerable environmental damage.

Steel production, which according to the World Steel Association (2024) consumes about 7% of global primary energy, is equally problematic. A single ton of steel can release up to 1.8 tons of CO₂, highlighting the need to explore more sustainable materials that reduce environmental impact without compromising structural functionality. This reality has driven research and development of eco-friendly alternatives such as bamboo, hemp, and bricks made from industrial waste.

Bamboo has gained popularity for its rapid growth and high strength—qualities that make it ideal for sustainable projects. A 2023 Yale University study revealed that this material can absorb up to 12 tons of CO₂ per hectare per year, a significantly higher amount compared to other woody plants. Its robust structure allows for use in various applications without requiring production processes that increase emissions.

Another option is hemp, which when combined with lime forms a material known as “hempcrete.” This composite has remarkable insulating properties and the ability to absorb carbon dioxide throughout its life cycle, making it an efficient choice for green construction. Researchers from the University of Bath have highlighted that it is lighter than conventional cement and contributes to the thermal regulation of buildings, positively impacting both energy consumption and living conditions.

Eco-friendly bricks, made from industrial waste such as fly ash, also offer a promising solution—reducing emissions by up to 50% compared to traditional bricks, according to a 2024 McKinsey & Company report. This innovation could transform urban construction and lower the carbon footprint without compromising structural safety.

Comparing these alternatives with traditional materials helps illustrate their environmental benefit. A ton of Portland cement generates about 900 kg of CO₂, while more sustainable options like fly ash cement produce only 300 kg of CO₂ per ton, according to the World Green Building Council. These figures highlight the potential of sustainable materials to reduce environmental impact.

Sustainable Tourism and Biodiversity Unite in CAF’s Program, by Daniel Madariaga

The adoption of these materials, however, is not without challenges. Obstacles include implementation costs, resource availability, and industry resistance. Nonetheless, some cities have begun leading the shift through public policies that encourage the use of sustainable alternatives. For example, Amsterdam aims for 20% of its new buildings to be constructed with low-impact materials by 2025—a goal that, according to city authorities, could serve as a model for other regions.

Social responsibility plays a vital role in this transition, as construction companies must take an active stance in assessing the environmental impact of the materials they use and in seeking options that promote global sustainability. Taking steps to mitigate environmental harm not only benefits society but also aligns with the expectations of younger generations, who demand a more conscious and committed approach to sustainable urban development.

The success of these initiatives will depend on cooperation among governments, businesses, and citizens. With current data supporting the advantages of sustainable alternatives, it is clear that the construction industry must move toward a balance between progress and ecological responsibility, ensuring a healthier environment for generations to come.

From vertical farming to green mobility, Daniel Madariaga is at the forefront of driving sustainable transformation in Mexico. As an EGADE graduate, he spearheads initiatives in ecological innovation, recycling, and responsible tourism.